Spotify Invites Indie Artists to Upload Their Own Music

Spotify Invites Indie Artists to Upload Their Own Music

Spotify is now enabling independent artists to upload their own music to the streaming service. This will allow indie artists

7 Websites to Discover New Music by Indie Artists

7 Websites to Discover New Music by Indie Artists

If mainstream music doesn’t appeal, you should check out indie artists online. Here are seven websites to help you discover new music by indie artists from around the world.
Read More

to take control of the process for themselves, with no need to go through a label or pay to use a third-party service.

Spotify for Artists

While most of us exclusively use Spotify to stream music, artists use Spotify in a different way. With the exception of Taylor Swift and a few others, artists want their music on the platform so that they can make money every time someone plays one of their songs.

This is why Spotify for Artists exists, as it enables the streaming music service to deal with artists directly. And while the popular artists have record labels doing the donkey work, independent artists are expected to do everything themselves.

Which, thanks to Spotify’s new initiative, even includes uploading their own music.

Upload Your Own Music

On the Spotify for Artists Blog, the streaming service explains how the option for artists to upload their own music has been the most requested feature. So, in collaboration with a handful of artists and labels, Spotify has developed the necessary tools.

The option to upload your own music is currently in betam and therefore limited to a few hundred U.S. artists. These include Noname, Michael Brun, VIAA, and Hot Shade. However, Spotify promises to expand the invite to more artists and labels in the future.

This means that, if you yourself are an indie artists looking to start streaming, you could one day have your music available to play on Spotify. The music streaming service suggests interested parties join the Spotify for Artists mailing list.

A Win-Win for All Concerned

This is a win-win for all concerned. Spotify gets more music on its service, and with minimal effort on its part, and the indie artists get a new platform to build a following, and the potential to make some money in the process.

If you’re not an ambitious indie artist, and just want to stream music all day, every day, check out our unofficial guide to Spotify

Spotify Music Streaming: The Unofficial Guide

Spotify Music Streaming: The Unofficial Guide

Spotify is the biggest music streaming service around. If you’re not sure how to use it, this guide will walk you through the service, as well as offer some crucial top tips.
Read More


12 New Amazon Products That’ll Make Your Home SmarterThe 8 Best iPhone Apps for Following Soccer

Source link

The Danger of 2 Million Spotify Users Figuring Out How to Use It Ad-Free – Make Tech Easier

Make Tech Easier

Sure, at first it seems exciting to read that two-million Spotify users figured out how to use the service ad-free, as we all hate ads, especially when you want to listen to your music uninterrupted, but believe it or not, this isn’t really a good thing overall.

If you want the Internet to continue on as it is, you actually need those ads to show up. Without them, there may not be anymore Internet as we know it.


When you listen to Spotify, you have a choice of using a limited version of the service for free or paying for the Premium version for $9.99 a month. In other words, you can get that uninterrupted music you’re looking for, but you’re going to have to pay for it.

Spotify filed something interesting with the SEC on March 23. They stated that this large group of their users were “suppressing advertisements without payment.” Ad-blockers were doing what they were designed to do.

“[We] have detected instances of third parties seeking to provide mobile device users a means to suppress advertisements without payment and gain access to features only available to the Ad-Supported Service on tablets,” reported the SEC filing.

Are you rejoicing? Have you already hit Google trying to figure out which ad-blockers were used? Read on to find out why it might not be such a good thing.


This is a double loss of income for Spotify. In the first instance, if users aren’t being shown ads and aren’t clicking on them, the streaming service is losing income there. And in the second instance, with so many figuring out how to get the service ad-free without paying the monthly premium, they’re losing out on that subscription money as well.

This is what everyone needs to realize, getting the Internet ad-free is not a good thing. If Spotify loses money, they may have to stop offering their service. Now, instead of having free service ad-free, you have no service.

And if this happens to more ad-supported websites and subscription services, we’ll lose more and more of our services. Imagine if there was no more Netflix or Hulu because users broke it and figured out how to get it for free.

Think of all those services you use, including Make Tech Easier, and what would happen if none of them existed anymore.


And the second reason this was particularly hurtful to Spotify is that they claim this led to them overstating their active monthly users. They actually had 157 million users and not 159 at the end of 2017.

It may not seem like that big of of a deal to you, but Spotify filed for an IPO in February on the New York Stock Exchange. Potential investors are looking for accurate reporting of data. With wrong numbers being given, it could affect Spotify’s stock.

So now not only have they lost monthly premiums and ad revenue, now the value of their stock is being affected. This isn’t a good thing for users.

Sure, it’s nice to have an uninterrupted service with no ads that you didn’t have to pay for, but Spotify will end up losing much more than that. If it gets bad enough, they may need to shut their proverbial doors.

In a way this is similar to what happened years ago with the Internet when people were sharing music files for free on Napster. It was great to get all that free music! But if artists aren’t getting paid for their work, they’ll have to stop creating it. That’s why they outlawed it.

Likewise for the Internet. This is business. Website owners need you to view/click those ads so that they can get paid. It’s more than just a paycheck. They have to pay their server monthly or yearly, they have to pay a yearly fee to update the registration on their domain, etc. If there’s no money coming in, they can’t do that, and they lose their business.

Two-million users getting Spotify ad-free with no premium fee is not a good thing for anyone in the long run.

Source link